Jupiter DAO Resolution #2: Refining the Proposal Process (Key points)

The DAO is evolving, and DAO Resolution #2 aims to enhance its proposal process by focusing on two key areas: voting thresholds and Work Group $JUP allocations. These changes, proposed for community feedback, seek to strengthen the DAO’s legitimacy, accountability, and alignment with its mission to accelerate Jupiter’s growth. Below is a concise overview of the proposed resolutions.

Key Points of DAO Resolution #2

Resolution 2A: Voting Thresholds and “Abstain”

Increase Voting Threshold: Raise the passing threshold for DAO votes from a simple majority to a 65% supermajority to ensure broader community support and stronger social mandates.

Remove Abstain Option: Eliminate “Abstain” as a voting option, as it dilutes voter sentiment and undermines Active Staking Rewards, which incentivize clear opinions. Abstain votes (10-15% currently) effectively act as “No” votes, complicating supermajority requirements.

Benefits: Encourages coalition-building, reflects clearer community sentiment, and enhances DAO credibility.

Resolution 2B: Work Group $JUP Allocations

One-Year Terms: Limit Work Group (WG) proposals to one-year terms, requiring renewal for subsequent years, replacing multi-year $JUP allocations.

Retroactive $JUP Allocation: Remove $JUP from initial WG budgets; instead, allocate $JUP retroactively at the end of the term based on performance.

Formalized Measures of Success: Require WGs to include 1-5 qualitative and quantitative metrics in proposals to evaluate their impact on the DAO’s mission.

Performance Evaluation Vote: Conduct a formal vote at the end of each WG’s term to determine $JUP bonuses based on performance against stated metrics.

Proposed $JUP Bonus Tiers (per full-time member, based on WG size at proposal):

  • Tier 1 (Below Expectations): 25,000 $JUP
  • Tier 2 (As Expected): 75,000 $JUP
  • Tier 3 (Above Expectations): 100,000 $

Tier 4 (Critical for DAO Success): 150,000 $JUP

Benefits:

Reduces FUD around $JUP allocations, easing the proposal process.

Enhances accountability by tying rewards to performance.

Attracts talent by providing predictable, merit-based rewards.

Note: These changes apply only to future WGs, not previously approved ones.


                   FULL PROPOSALS HERE 

Previous Post Next Post